The concepts of parallel universes (or the multiverse) and exoplanets are related more through philosophical and theoretical physics than through direct observation.

🌌 Parallel Universes (Multiverse Theory)

The idea of a multiverse suggests that our universe is just one of many universes that exist. Several theories in physics propose different ways this might occur:  

• Infinite Universe (Level I Multiverse): If space is infinite and the matter within it is distributed according to certain rules, the contents of the universe must eventually repeat. Given the finite number of ways particles can arrange themselves, there would be other regions, or “parallel universes,” far beyond our observable horizon that are essentially identical to ours, complete with copies of Earth and its inhabitants.  

• Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of Quantum Mechanics: This theory suggests that every time a quantum event has multiple possible outcomes, the universe splits into separate, non-communicating “parallel universes,” one for each outcome. This creates an ever-branching reality with infinite variations, including those with different versions of exoplanets.  

• Inflationary Multiverse (Level II Multiverse): Proposed by models of cosmic inflation, this suggests that our universe is one “bubble” or “pocket” universe that formed as the result of a larger, eternally inflating space. Other bubbles could have different fundamental constants and laws of physics.  

🪐 Exoplanets and the Multiverse

Exoplanets (extrasolar planets) are planets orbiting stars outside our Solar System. Their discovery and study relate to the multiverse concept in a couple of ways:  

• The Fine-Tuning Problem: One of the main motivations for the multiverse theory is the fine-tuning of our universe’s physical constants (like the strength of gravity, or the mass of an electron). If these constants were slightly different, life could not exist. The multiverse theory, particularly the Level II type, offers an explanation: we must be in one of the universes where the constants are suitable for life, because we couldn’t exist to observe it otherwise (the Anthropic Principle).

• The Exoplanet Analogy: The vast number and diversity of exoplanets discovered has been used to draw an analogy with the multiverse. Before the 1990s, only planets in our Solar System were known. Some philosophers argued Earth might be unique. The discovery of thousands of exoplanets, proving the vast diversity and abundance of planetary systems, shattered that notion. Similarly, the “Multiplanetverse” analogy suggests that just as we found countless worlds within our universe, the Multiverse hypothesis implies countless universes, solving the fine-tuning problem by simple abundance.  

• Search for Life: The discovery of potentially habitable exoplanets (planets in the “habitable zone” where liquid water could exist) fuels the search for extraterrestrial life. If life is common in our universe, it suggests that the conditions required for it aren’t excessively “fine-tuned,” which would reduce the need for a multiverse explanation. However, if life is found to be extremely rare, it might strengthen the fine-tuning argument and, by extension, the multiverse hypothesis.  

In essence, while the existence of exoplanets doesn’t prove the multiverse, the sheer number and variety of them provide context for considering the probability of different realities and the conditions necessary for complex structures like planets and life to form.

For more on the theoretical physics behind the concept, you might find this video interesting: Evidence for Parallel Universes — Max Tegmark / Serious Science. This video discusses the concept of parallel universes and its evidence, which is closely tied to the cosmic structures that contain exoplanets.

How will be planets in other universes if multiverse theory is correct

The nature of planets in other universes depends entirely on which specific multiverse theory is correct, as these theories propose different ways in which other universes could exist. The diversity would range from planets identical to Earth to entities we wouldn’t even recognize as planets due to alien physics.

🔬 Level I & II Multiverses (Changing Physical Constants)

In theories like the Eternal Inflation model (a Level II Multiverse) or the Infinite Flat Universe (Level I Multiverse), other universes could be separated from ours by vast distances in a larger, expanding space, or exist as distinct “bubble universes.”

• Identical Planets: In an infinite universe (Level I), the matter and energy distribution must eventually repeat. Given enough space, there would be copies of every arrangement of particles, meaning there are planets (and solar systems) physically identical to Earth and its neighbors, just unimaginably far away.

• Fundamentally Different Planets: In the Level II Multiverse (bubble universes), each universe could have a different set of fundamental constants (like the speed of light, the strength of gravity, or the mass of the electron).

• If gravity is much stronger, planets would be denser and smaller, or perhaps all matter would instantly collapse into black holes, preventing planet formation altogether.

• If the fine-structure constant (governing electromagnetism) were different, chemical bonds might not form, and rocky planets could not exist as we know them.

• In many of these universes, the conditions would be so hostile that the formation of stable, long-lasting planets is impossible, leading to either a cosmos of formless plasma or quickly collapsing matter.

✨ Level III Multiverse (Quantum Branching)

The Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics suggests that every quantum event that has multiple possible outcomes causes the universe to “split,” with each outcome realized in a different, non-communicating parallel world.

• Slightly Different Planets: In these universes, the fundamental laws of physics and constants are the same as ours. The differences in planets would stem from variations in initial conditions, random quantum fluctuations, or different historical events.

• Planets would be structurally similar to those in our universe, but their orbits, atmospheres, or geological histories could be different. For example, there could be a version of Earth where the impact that formed the Moon never happened, resulting in a planet without tides.

• The planet itself would still be a rocky or gas giant, governed by the same rules of gravity and chemistry, but the details of its composition, life (if any), and landscapes would vary based on every different choice or quantum outcome throughout its history.

🤯 Level IV Multiverse (Different Mathematical Structures)

The most abstract theoretical level suggests that every mathematically possible universe is a real, existing universe.

• Non-Planetary Worlds: Planets, as we define them, might not even exist. Worlds in these universes could be built from completely different mathematical structures or a number of spatial dimensions other than the three we experience. This would lead to forms of matter, space, and time so alien that they are virtually impossible for us to comprehend or visualize using our current physics framework.

The incredible diversity of exoplanets already found in our own universe—from “hot Jupiters” to “Super-Earths”—is a strong reminder that even within the same physical laws, the variety of worlds is enormous, and the multiverse theories suggest this variety is just the starting point.

For more details on these different multiverse concepts, you can watch The Multiverse Hypothesis Explained by Neil deGrasse Tyson. This video explains the basis of the multiverse hypothesis, which dictates the theoretical conditions of planets in other universes.

Please like subscribe comment your precious comment on universe discoveries

Full article source google