
Architect Jordan William Hughes has designed a space elevator called Ascensio that would transport passengers 36,000 km above Earth. The elevator would consist of a long cable that connects a floating platform on Earth to an asteroid in geosynchronous orbit. Drones would transport passengers and cargo up and down the cable like trains on a track
Hughes’ design won the Architecture and Innovation for Space Grand Prix Award from the Jacques Rogerie Foundation, which includes a $11,000 prize.
Here are some other details about the design:
- The elevator would have six cables for each trip.
- Three cables would carry humans and oxygen, and the other three would carry cargo.
- The cable would be about 5 cm in diameter and would need to be durable enough to span 100,000 km.
- Scientists believe the best location for the elevator’s base would be in the Pacific Ocean near the equator.
- A counterweight at the top of the elevator would keep the center of mass above geostationary orbit. This would create enough centrifugal force to counter gravity and keep the cable taut and upright.
An architect from Cumbria, England, has revealed his ambitious plans to build a space elevator capable of transporting humans to space. Called Ascensio, the elevator is comprised of a long cable tethering an asteroid trapped in geosynchronous orbit to a floating platform back on Earth
Jordan William Hughes, a Barrow-born architect, has ambitious plans for a ‘space elevator’. This revolutionary form of space travel could replace inefficient rockets with a cable that connects Earth with an orbiting satellite, according to Mr Hughes
A space elevator would need to be at least 35,786 km (22,236 mi) tall to reach geostationary orbit around Earth. The cable would experience the most tension at this point, so the material and design must be strong enough to support its own weight from the surface up to this height
Some say a space elevator would need to be around 60,000 km (37,282 miles) to be geostationary. Others say a space elevator would need to be 100,000 km (62,000 miles) long to stay in orbit. This is roughly a quarter of the way from Earth’s surface to the moon
Some say it’s possible to build a space elevator, while others say it’s not.
Some say it’s possible because it’s made of a carbon nanotubes composite strip that’s secured to a seaward ocean stage. Others say it’s not possible because we don’t have the technology to do it now. Some scientists and engineers say the challenges are enough to conclude that a space elevator will never be built on Earth.
Some say a space elevator would be practical because it would be a more practical way to get to orbit than rockets. It would also allow us to take large payloads into space safely and easily, which could lead to building cities on the moon.
However, others say a space elevator would be expensive and that we don’t have the materials or capability to construct it. Some say the available materials are not strong and light enough to make a space elevator practical. Others say that the difficulty of construction scales with the gravity.
A space elevator would also present a navigational hazard to aircraft and spacecraft
According to physicist Bradley Edwards, it would take 15 years and $10 billion to build a space elevator. However, Edwards also proposed that if nanotubes with enough strength could be made in bulk, a space elevator could be built in less than a decade.
According to some designs, it would take about eight days to elevate an object into geostationary orbit. With proper radiation shielding, humans could theoretically take the ride
A space elevator would need to be built on the equator. This is because the center of mass of the elevator must be in geostationary orbit, regardless of where the base anchor is located
The base of the elevator would need to be near the equator, with the other end attached to a counterweight in space. The elevator would need to be thickest at the geostationary orbit, which is where Earth’s atmosphere ends and space begins.
The elevator would be invisible to the human eye, except on clear nights when it could be seen from up to 5,000 km away
As of March 2020, Quora said that Elon Musk doesn’t have the materials technology to build a space elevator on Earth. However, in 2023, SpaceX designed elevator buttons for crew members to use to board spaceships, representing the concept of a space elevator
In 2025, Obayashi Corporation plans to start building a space elevator, with plans to use it in 2050
However, the concept of the space elevator which can transport things from earth to space has not materialised in reality. Representing this imagined concept, the elevator buttons have been designed in Elon Musk’s SpaceX which will be used by the crew members to board spaceships
The theory behind the space elevator is that the competing forces of gravity and centrifugal force would hold the cable up and stationary
Gravity pulls down on the cable, while centrifugal force from the orbiting counterweight pulls up. As objects ascend, the downward gravitational pull lessens, while upward centrifugal forces strengthen. These forces balance at geostationary orbit altitude, about 36,000 km above Earth.
The space elevator concept began in 1895 with Russian rocket scientist Konstantin Tsiolkovsky. It has since been imagined in Star Trek and the Halo universe
The concept of a space elevator was first proposed by Russian physicist Konstantin Tsiolkovsky in 1895. Tsiolkovsky published a paper after visiting the Eiffel Tower, theorizing about the construction of a structure 22,000 miles high.
The concept was then proposed again by Leningrad engineer Yuri Artsutanov in 1960. American engineer Jerome Pearson rediscovered the concept in 1975.
Bradley Edwards developed the space elevator concept further than anyone before him. In 2000, he published the results of a six-month study considering the feasibility of a space elevator
Please like subscribe comment your precious thoughts on universe discoveries
Full article source google
Best men and women wear on heavy discount on Amazon
nice one
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks a lot🌹
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great discussion of the primary technological limitation to a space elevator, we do not have the material for the cable.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nanotubes technology we have and now design it will be possible in future I think 🤔
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe the “far distant” future. “Carbon nanotube development appears to have focused on making very short fibers as powder additives in other materials. The current manufacturing methods to make ultra-long carbon nanotubes have stalled and are capable of making at most 0.5 m long”
LikeLiked by 2 people
In fact, only carbon nanotubes, with a yield strength around 100 GPa and a low density, provide a realistic taper ratio of 1.9 (Pugno, 2006). For this reason, carbon nanotubes are the material of choice for modern space elevator concepts
LikeLike
Single crystal graphene is currently the most promising option. Graphene is a two-dimensional form of carbon that is easier to scale up than nanotubes
LikeLike
Interesting idea. Thanks for sharing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very good post 💥
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes I said also let’s be friends Kumar😊
LikeLike
I think as technology is expanding leaps and bounds technology for space elevators will be developed soon and in near future we can see space elevators 👍
LikeLike
How cool is that?
LikeLiked by 1 person
You will love it.😊 Let’s be friends
LikeLiked by 1 person