If true, this theory could explain how all of the matter in our universe was created. SCATTERED THROUGHOUT THE UNIVERSE are ravenous black holes that pull gas, dust, light and even other black holes into their maw, never to be seen again

Could black holes lead to other universes?This is called the event horizon. The singularity along with the event horizon is called the black “hole”. Some believe that they could be paths to other universes but not other dimensions. Other dimensions is a different phenomenon that is rarely related to black holes

SCATTERED THROUGHOUT THE UNIVERSE are ravenous black holes that pull gas, dust, light and even other black holes into their maw, never to be seen again. Like a riptide pulling swimmers out to sea, the gravity inside a black hole pulls matter past a point of no return, called the event horizon, and condenses it so tightly that physics as we know it begins to break down, creating a “singularity.” It’s this singularity, in particular, that troubles physicists because it throws their most important theories about the universe into question. 

That’s why theoretical physicist Nikodem Poplawski, Ph.D., asked a big question back in 2010: what if black holes don’t contain a singularity at all? Instead, Poplawski’s theory suggests, the center of a black hole could contain a pathway into another universe. Weirder yet, his theory predicts that this may be how our own universe was created.

A paper describing this work, titled “Radial motion into an Einstein–Rosen bridge,” was published 14 years ago in the journal Physics Letters B. While the theory captured attention at the time, this topic is still rather niche among physicists. Many researchers have either moved on, or have never heard of the idea to begin with.

“It’s not easy to find a specialist on this topic,” says Nick Gorkavyi, Ph.D., a scientist and programmer at NASA who, alongside Nobel laureate John Mather, developed a theory about pulsating universes inside black holes.

A central concept driving Poplawski’s black hole theory is the notion of something called torsion, which behaves similarly to a gravitational force acting upon matter in the universe. Cosmological torsion is not something that science has proven —or, disproven—yet, but it’s a big idea that Poplawski believes is worth chasing because it could transform how we understand physics.

A major achievement of Poplawski is that he was one of the first in the 21st century to return to constructing a theoretical model of a universe inside a black hole,” he says. “I believe Poplawski is right, and our universe is inside a black hole hundreds of billions of light-years in size.”

The big question lying ahead for Poplawski and torsion is whether it might be possible to one day find concrete evidence to boost this idea from being simply hypothetical. Luckily, there are a couple ways that could happen, he says. Investigations into whether the universe is closed (meaning if it’s curved without an edge) or into the nature of inflation via the study of cosmic background radiation could offer support to the theory. 

“It is an interesting and intriguing possibility,” Stojkovic says.

Over the years scientists have looked into the possibility that black holes could be wormholes to other galaxies. They may even be, as some have suggested, a path to another universe. 

Such an idea has been floating around for some time: Einsteinteamed up with Nathan Rosen to theorise bridges that connect two different points in space-time in 1935. But it gained some fresh ground in the 1980s when physicist Kip Thorne — one of the world’s leading experts on the astrophysical implications of Einstein’s general theory of relativity — raised a discussion about whether objects could physically travel through them.

Certainly, if black holes do lead to another part of a galaxy or another universe, there would need to be something opposite to them on the other side. Could this be a white hole — a theory put forward by Russian cosmologist Igor Novikov in 1964? Novikov proposed that a black hole links to a white hole that exists in the past. Unlike a black hole, a white hole will allow light and matter to leave, but light and matter will not be able to enter.

Scientists have continued to explore the potential connection between black and white holes. In their 2014 study published in the journal Physical Review D, physicists Carlo Rovelli and Hal M. Haggard claimed that “there is a classic metric satisfying the Einstein equations outside a finite space-time region where matter collapses into a black hole and then emerges from a while hole.” In other words, all of the material black holes have swallowed could be spewed out, and black holes may become white holes when they die.

The idea that black holes could be doorways to other universes is a fascinating one, often explored in science fiction. While there’s no definitive proof to support this theory, it’s a compelling concept rooted in theoretical physics.
Here’s a breakdown of the theory:

• Wormholes: Some scientists speculate that black holes might be connected to wormholes, which are hypothetical tunnels through spacetime. These tunnels could potentially connect our universe to others.
• Relativity: Einstein’s theory of relativity suggests that spacetime can be warped and curved. Black holes, with their immense gravitational pull, could create such distortions that could lead to the formation of wormholes.
• Multiverse Theory: The multiverse theory proposes that there are multiple universes, possibly existing side by side or even overlapping. Black holes might serve as gateways between these parallel realities.
  However, it’s important to note that these are theoretical concepts, and there’s currently no observational evidence to support them. The conditions required for the formation of wormholes and the existence of multiple universes are extremely speculative and difficult to study.
  Would you like to explore any of these concepts in more detail? We could discuss the implications of wormholes, the multiverse theory, or the challenges of studying black holes.

What is multiverse hypothesis

The multiverse hypothesis is a theoretical framework that proposes the existence of multiple universes, or “parallel worlds,” beyond our own observable universe. These universes could be vastly different from ours, with varying physical laws, properties, and histories.
There are several different versions of the multiverse hypothesis, including:

• Level I: This level suggests that our universe is just one of many infinite universes that exist within a vast cosmic landscape. These universes would all be governed by the same physical laws, but they might have different initial conditions.
• Level II: This level proposes that there are multiple universes with different physical laws and constants. These universes could have vastly different properties, such as different numbers of dimensions or different fundamental forces.
• Level III: This level suggests that there are an infinite number of universes, each with its own unique history and timeline. These universes could be completely disconnected from each other, or they might interact in strange and unpredictable ways.
  The multiverse hypothesis is a fascinating concept that has captured the imagination of scientists and philosophers alike. While there is no direct evidence to support its existence, it is a useful tool for understanding the nature of our universe and the possibility of other realities beyond our own.
  Would you like to know more about a specific level of the multiverse hypothesis, or perhaps discuss some of the implications of this theory?

The existence of a multiverse is a subject of ongoing scientific debate and speculation. There is no definitive proof or observational evidence to support its existence. However, some theoretical frameworks and cosmological observations have led to the consideration of this possibility.
Here are some arguments for and against the multiverse hypothesis:
Arguments for:

• Inflationary Cosmology: This theory suggests that the universe underwent a period of rapid expansion shortly after the Big Bang. This could have led to the creation of multiple bubble universes, each with its own set of physical laws.
• Quantum Mechanics: Some interpretations of quantum mechanics, such as the many-worlds interpretation, suggest that every possible outcome of a quantum event exists in a separate universe.
• Mathematical Necessity: Some argue that the laws of mathematics suggest the existence of multiple universes, as there are many possible mathematical structures that could describe the universe.
  Arguments against:
• Lack of Evidence: There is no direct observational evidence to support the existence of a multiverse. Any evidence would likely be indirect and difficult to interpret.
• Occam’s Razor: The principle of Occam’s Razor suggests that the simplest explanation is often the most likely. The idea of a single universe is simpler than the idea of multiple universes.
• Testability: It may be impossible to test the existence of a multiverse, as it is outside of our observable universe.
  Ultimately, the question of whether a multiverse exists remains a mystery. While there are theoretical arguments for and against its existence, definitive proof is likely to be elusive.

Please like subscribe comment your precious thoughts on universe discoveries

Full article source google

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/Satyam55

Buy me a coffee!” (your opportunity to say thanks for the free stuff and to encourage me to do even more)

<!– /wp:heading https://www.amazon.in/b?_encoding=UTF8&tag=555101-21&link

“If you like my work or the free stuff on this website and want to say thanks, or encourage me to do more, you can buy me a coffee!
Contribute to my coffee fund with any amount you are comfortable to pay.
The coffee will give me the ‘kick’ to work even harder to empower creative entrepreneurs